For a hardcopy pdf of this document, contact the Office of Compliance Responsible Officer:. Associate Vice Chancellor-Human Resources. Responsible Office:. Human Resources. Origination Date:. Date of Revision:. Date of Last Review:. Policy Summary.

GUEST ROOM | Should Grad Students Be Banned From Dating Each Other?

The policy broadly bans any consensual sexual or romantic relationship between MIT faculty, staff, graduate student, or undergraduate student when one party holds authority over the other. The policy bans all sexual or romantic relationships between faculty or staff and undergraduates. The policy also prohibits relationships between graduate and undergraduate students when one party has authority over the other, such as relationships between students and Graduate Resident Tutors or Teaching Assistants.

Faculty and staff are prohibited from relationships with graduate students if they are in any position of power over the students. Furthermore, supervisors and mentors, such as Principal Investigators, are prohibited from relationships with those they supervise.

relations with current undergraduate or graduate students who have a major or minor in graduate and undergraduate student employees (including teaching.

Jump to navigation. With professional responsibility comes power. It is incumbent on faculty members not to abuse, nor to seem to abuse, the power with which they are entrusted. Faculty members are prohibited from initiating or engaging in romantic or sexual behavior with undergraduate students at Princeton University. Faculty members are also prohibited from requesting or accepting sexual favors from undergraduate students at Princeton University. Faculty members are defined as tenured, tenure-track faculty, instructors, and lecturers.

Undergraduate students include those matriculating at Princeton as well as those from other institutions who come to Princeton for pre-bac, visiting, summer, and post-bac programs. Contact the Office of the Dean of the Faculty for policies relating to consensual relations with students for Academic Professionals. Princeton University. In addition, no faculty member, researcher, graduate student, visiting student, or undergraduate course assistant shall initiate or engage in a romantic or sexual behavior with any student, including a graduate student or DCE student, who is enrolled in a course taught by that individual or otherwise subject to that individual’s academic supervision or evaluation.

Academic supervision includes teaching, advising, supervising research, supervising teaching or grading, and serving as Departmental Representative or DGS of the student’s academic program. Academic evaluation includes assigning grades, evaluating degree progress, serving as a committee member, and providing letters of reference. Beyond these prohibited relations, all romantic or sexual relationships between individuals of different University status require heightened awareness.

For example, a faculty member may wish to initiate a personal relationship with an individual over whom he or she has no current professional supervisory responsibility.

Since #MeToo, colleges crack down on romantic relationships between professors and students

Stay plugged into Penn with this daily newsletter rounding up all of the top headlines from top headlines from the DP, 34th Street, and Under the Button. The week’s top stories from the DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, and delivered into your inbox every Sunday morning. Subscribe to get the week’s top stories from The DP and beyond, meticulously curated for parents and alumni, delivered directly to your inbox.

A new policy banning all sexual relations between undergraduate students and faculty members at Penn went into effect on March The announcement is not unprecedented in the world of higher education. In fact, among other Ivy League institutions, Penn is relatively late to introduce this new policy shift.

Date Issued: January 1, Date Last Revised: May 1, between (1) a student and a faculty member, graduate teaching or research assistant, Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation.

Are you dating a PhD student, or married to one? Watching your spouse go through the PhD process can be confusing at best and downright terrible at worst. Your partner may have to be away for hours or days at a time. Keeping that experience in mind, here are a few things to remember about dating a PhD student. Where an undergraduate student could get by skimming the readings, grad students are expected to read everything and make intelligent comments about what they have read. Multiple choice tests are not part of the curriculum.

Thus, your partner will need to put in many hours of work each week, consistently, in order to achieve his or her goal. This is a long grind and it will take time and lots of dedication, but they will cross the finish line.

Professors banned from dating grad students under new Princeton U. policy

Despite receiving media attention in and , UBC policy concerning faculty-student relationships remains unchanged and, for the most part, unspoken of. If a student and professor had a relationship for outside gain, it would be mediated using the Conflict of Interest policy. Mac Lean says student-teacher relations should be given more attention by UBC — not necessarily because he believes that a complete ban should be introduced, but because it deserves a conversation.

Last Revised Date: Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, “Student” means any person, whether graduate, undergraduate.

The days of Princeton University professors dating graduate students in other departments are coming to an end , campus officials said. Professors had previously been permitted to have relationships with graduate students as long as they were not in their classes or under their supervision. So, for example, an English professor was allowed to date a Ph. But, Princeton reconsidered the policy in the wake of the MeToo movement and nationwide calls for stricter guidelines to prevent professors from having too much power over graduate students, especially in personal relationships.

Princeton already banned all relationships between faculty and undergraduate students. But graduate students, who are in their late 20s or 30s, were previously permitted to date professors they did not work with or study under. However, no one will have to break up a current relationship because of the new rules, campus officials said. Faculty members and graduate students already in relationships will be allowed to continue and will be exempt from the revised policy.

Several colleges and universities, including Rutgers University , are considering rewriting their policies on relationships between professors and students.

Dating a PhD Student: A Survival Guide

Sorry, but this is one of the reasons life in the academy IS worthwhile for me. It lifts my spirits to work with youthful people. Undergraduates are at the peak of their physical attractiveness and, having worked elsewhere with a bunch of tired-looking people, this is much better, regardless how old I look. Maybe this reason is felt more by faculty who have not yet embraced their own declining looks.

I earned these wrinkles, but I’d rather not spend all my time with people my age. I feel younger when I am not looking in a mirror.

› hospital › graduate-students-dating-undergraduate-student.

Sexual or romantic relationships may raise concerns of conflict of interest, abuse of authority, favoritism, and unfair treatment when both people are in the MIT work or academic environment, and one person holds a position of power or authority over the other. These relationships may also affect others in the work or academic environment, undermining the integrity of their supervision and evaluation as well. These concerns exist even when the relationship is considered consensual by both individuals.

In some instances, consent may not be as freely given as the more senior person in the relationship believes. Because of the possible adverse effects on the other party and on their fellow students, co-workers, colleagues, and others, the Institute prohibits all faculty, other academic instructional staff, other employees, and other non-student members of the MIT community paid or unpaid from having sexual or romantic relationships with certain MIT students and employees, whether or not the relationship is consensual.

A summary of this policy is as follows, with more detail in the noted sections:. Where this policy imposes a duty to notify and recuse, that duty falls on the person in the position of power or authority in the relationship. Where required, notification and recusal must take place as soon as practical after any action has been taken by either party to establish a sexual or romantic relationship.

Faculty, other academic instructional staff , other employees, and other members of the MIT community other than MIT students are prohibited from having a sexual or romantic relationship with any undergraduate student at MIT. Such relationships with undergraduates are always prohibited. See Section 9. In addition, faculty members and other academic instructional staff may not exercise academic authority over any graduate student or other learner with whom they had a prior sexual or romantic relationship.

In such a case, the faculty or other academic staff member must promptly notify their department head, dean, or other supervisor and must recuse themselves from any academic authority over that student or other learner.

Consensual Relationships Policy

This relationship vests considerable trust in the teacher, who, in turn, bears authority and accountability as a mentor, educator, and evaluator. The unequal institutional power inherent in this relationship heightens the vulnerability of the student and the potential for coercion. The pedagogical relationship between teacher and student must be protected from influences or activities that can interfere with learning and personal development.

Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided. In addition to creating the potential for coercion, any such relationship jeopardizes the integrity of the educational process by creating a conflict of interest and may impair the learning environment for other students.

Finally, such situations may expose the University and the teacher to liability for violation of laws against sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

› GradSchool › comments › dating_a_grad_studen.

HR contacts. Employee Relations contacts. Purdue University is committed to maintaining an environment in which learning, discovery and engagement take place in a professional atmosphere of mutual respect and trust. Amorous Relationships can develop within the University community between faculty, students and staff. The disparity of power when an Amorous Relationship is between 1 a student and a faculty member, graduate teaching or research assistant, or any other University employee who has educational responsibility over the student, 2 a supervisor and subordinate, or 3 senior and junior colleagues in the same department or unit makes the individuals involved susceptible to exploitation.

Relationships between faculty and students are particularly susceptible to exploitation.

Romantic and Sexual Relationships

Faculty, administrators, and others who educate, supervise, evaluate, employ, counsel, coach or otherwise make decisions or recommendations as to the other person in connection with their employment or education at the University, or who otherwise have actual or apparent authority over a student or subordinate, should understand the fundamentally asymmetrical nature of the relationship.

Such relationships are prohibited. Intimate Relationships between the following individuals are specifically prohibited:. This list is not exhaustive; other circumstances in which one individual has greater power or authority over another may also violate this policy. If individuals already in an Intimate Relationship foresee the possibility of entering into a relationship of power or authority for example, through one party enrolling in a program or a class, or taking up a new position , or where an Intimate Relationship arises in the context of an existing relationship of power or authority, the individual with supervisory, evaluative or other position of authority and power must notify the relevant supervisors, directors or deans immediately.

The relevant supervisor, dean or director shall have the authority, in consultation with the Office of Equal Opportunity, to set reasonable conditions to eliminate both the substance and appearance of conflict of interest or abuse of power or authority; to prevent the establishment of direct authority; to minimize and attenuate indirect authority; or to grant an exception to the policy; provided, however, that exceptions will be granted only in extenuating and extraordinary circumstances.

and Sexual Relationships Between Faculty/Staff and Graduate Students and Sexual Relationships Between Faculty/Staff and Undergraduate Students.

The University has an interest in ensuring that academic, employment, and business matters are decided on objective bases. At an institution such as the University of Arizona, a variety of personal and romantic relationships may exist among employees, University agents, students, and third parties. The University establishes this personnel policy to address conflicts of interest arising from interpersonal relationships not otherwise covered by existing policies or law.

The intent of this policy is to direct employees to disclose relationships that have created or may create conflicts of interest and to give the University an opportunity to manage and reconcile any such conflicts, if possible. Employees who violate this policy may be subject to disciplinary action; however, because this policy is designed to encourage employees to disclose personal relationships that may give rise to or have given rise to conflicts of interest, an alleged violation of this policy may not be a basis upon which employees may file grievances against one another.

Relationships with Students Outside the Instructional, Supervisory, or Evaluative Context: Romantic or sexual relationships between employees and students when the employees do not have a direct instructional, supervisory, or evaluative responsibility with respect to the student are not per se prohibited.

They may, however, result in a conflict of interest, particularly when the employee and student are in the same unit or in units that are allied. In such situations, employees shall remove themselves from any decisions that may reward or penalize students with whom they are or have been romantically or sexually involved. An employee violates this policy and his or her obligation to the student, to other students, to colleagues, and to the University when such employee participates in decisions that may reward or penalize a student with whom the employee has, or has had at any time, a romantic or sexual relationship.

Relationships with Employees and Students in Other Contexts: No University employee shall engage in a romantic or sexual relationship with another employee when one of those employees supervises or evaluates the other employee. No employee may supervise another employee or student with whom that employee lives, whether or not the individuals are engaged in a romantic or sexual relationship. If the immediate supervisor deems the plan unsatisfactory, then the supervisory employee may submit the plan to the next administrative level for review and acceptance or rejection.

The plan may include altering supervisory or reporting lines; moving a student to another section of the same class; appointing a different individual to serve on a thesis, dissertation, or evaluative committee; moving a supervisor or other individual to another position of the same or comparable status and duties; or establishing alternative means of evaluation of academic or work performance.

Universities Grapple with Student-Faculty Relationships

His idea of Friday night fun isn’t likely beer-chugging and Jello shooter contests. In fact, if you are used to dating undergrad peers, a relationship with a grad student can be substantially different. When you can make the most of your time together, keep your emotions in check and take an interest in your partner’s field of study, you’ll maximize the opportunity for a mutually satisfying relationship with a grad student.

She has come far in her academic career and can no longer afford to blow off studying for an impromptu romantic evening.

DATE OF ISSUANCE: This policy was originally approved on December 11, “Graduate Student” includes anyone who is enrolled in a graduate program.

This policy also applies to any individual under contract or on assignment at the university. This policy does not apply to student employees. Nothing in this policy replaces university policies on prohibited discrimination, harassment, and retaliation. Nor does it replace other university policies that may be related to conduct or relationships covered by this policy. The provisions of this policy apply regardless of the gender or the sexual orientation of the parties involved.

The university is committed to creating learning environments and working relationships in which students, faculty, and staff trust and respect one another. RIT recognizes that consensual romantic or sexual relationships between certain individuals in an educational environment may compromise the fairness and objectivity of educational decisions and the discharge of professional duties.

Indeed, consensual romantic or sexual relationships that occur in the context of educating, supervising, evaluating or mentoring students can be disruptive to the educational environment, not only to those involved in the romantic or sexual relationship but also to people around them. If an employee has a concern as to whether a relationship falls under this policy, the employee may seek confidential guidance from the Ombuds Office. Any faculty, staff, or administrator who is in a romantic or sexual relationship with another member of the RIT community over whom they have Authority, because of the inherent power differential that comes with that Authority, raises significant ethical, administrative, and legal risks, such as sexual harassment and perceptions of favoritism and preferential treatment.

Therefore, employees should be aware that entering into a Consensual Romantic or Sexual Relationship where there is a power differential creates the potential for risk to both parties. For the purposes of this policy, it is irrelevant whether the Employee is a Supervisor or exercises Academic Responsibilities with respect to the Student. The university prohibits any Supervisor from having, pursuing, or maintaining a Consensual Romantic or Sexual Relationship with any Employee who reports to the Supervisor.

While the policy prohibits certain Consensual Romantic or Sexual Relationships, the university understands that there may be the need for exceptions in rare circumstances.

Dating In Graduate School